Fish as Biomarkers

How would you determine the effects of an oil spill on a marine environment? Most responses would be to test the level of contaminants in the water. While this test would give the levels how does it relate to the health of the biotic marine life forms? Simply carrying out physical and chemical tests of the abiotic environment is not comprehensive enough to represent the health of the entire marine environment. Coupling these methods with the use of biomarkers is a more comprehensive approach. A biomarker is the biological measure of an organism’s biological state this was a definition given by a doctor (Mandal 2016).

Picture taken from Intech Open

When choosing an organisms or species as a biomarker in oil spill it must be representative of the ecosystem affected. Fishes have both molecular and cellular defense systems to protect them from harmful substances. This includes detoxifying enzymes and molecules which are used to determine the impact of oil on the organism as well as its environment (Sturve, 2014). To get on how the marine ecosystem is progressing in the wake of the oil spill constant testing or monitoring is done on fishes at the location. Also knowing the extent to which the adult fishes were impacted can give an early indication on how future offspring in turn would be impacted. Use of biomarkers or biomonitoring can be done for years to give an idea of how the marine environment is coping long after the spill. In most cases the values given by biomarkers decrease over time indicating that the environment it returning to normalcy.

References

Ananya Mandal 2016. What is a Biomarker, News Medical Life Sciences Retrieved from http://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-a-Biomarker.aspx

Joachim Sturve, Lennart Balk, Birgitta liewenborg margaretha Adolfsson-Erici, Lars Forlin and Bethanie and Carney Almroth 2014 Effects of an oil spill in a harbor assessed using biomarkers of exposure in eelpout Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236613/

Fish, Artificial Habitat, Oil Platform (Rigs to Reefs)

On most occasions when we hear about oil and fish together we think of some disaster in which fishes are killed in large numbers and a bunch of associated ecosystem impacts. Though this trend of thought does hold some truth it is not always so. Thanks to oil platforms erected in the oceans there is as at least one positive relation between oil and fish. The structures are favourable for fishes and other organisms such that it acts as an artificial habitat. The lattices of the platforms have a large surface area this is the type of habitat demersal fish such as Rockfish seek. It provides them with shelter, food and a place to hide and avoid predators (Goldfarb, 2014). Normally after oil activities have ceased these platforms are decommissioned (Love et.al. 2015). This means that the platform is removed; however the “Rigs to Reefs” concept considers the fish habitat present. As a result the entire platform is not removed and the fish get to keep their habitat. In some cases such as in Louisiana liability of the rig is transferred from the operator to the state this was reported by (The Environmental News Network, 2013).

Picture by the Gulf of Mexico Foundation

The larger surface area of the platform does not benefit just Rockfish but other fish as well. It provides them with the same protection from predators. The surface area ratio provided by the platform compared to that of the rocky seafloor can be more suitable for fish. As a result the secondary production there is greater than that of natural ecosystems. Secondary production is the sum of new biomass from individual organisms in an area over a particular time period. This suggests that organisms, fish in particular thrive better in the artificial habitat at the platform. Also studies have shown that outside organisms also move to the platform to live, they are said to be recruited. Another interesting fact is that there are assemblages of fish at different heights of the platform (Claisse et. al, 2014). The younger fish tend to be at the higher levels and move to lower levels as adults. Sometimes adult fish leave the platform altogether to live in other environments. However a true statement would be to say that without the platform many fish species would not have survived in the open ocean. This could be because of the food web that is developed at these platforms as there are so many organisms present. Plankton is one food source fed on by small fish and these fish provide food for larger fishes there. So predation is not absent in this habitat just greatly reduced.

Picture taken from Flower Garden Banks, National Marine Sanctuary 

Some fish species at the platform are commercial fish and as a result fishing activity there does contribute to the economy. However there is a concern about the exploitation of fish there. This is as a result of the biomass and population there developing so quickly that it gives the impression that the population is resilient enough to support constant fishing. Another unsettling factor is the possibility of seepage from the capped platform. This could lead to contamination of fish at the platform. In a study done on a capped platform, it was found that the fish there, had similar amounts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (contaminant) when compared to fish away from the site. Therefore this would suggest that contamination risk is low for a well capped rig.

Personally I believe the rig to reef concept is a great idea and would hope to actually witness one in the near future.

References

Ben Goldfarb, 2014, Offshore Oil Rigs can provide prime fish habitat, High Country News Retrieved from http://www.hcn.org/articles/offshore-oil-rigs-can-provide-prime-fish-habitat

The Environmental News Network, 2013. Oil Platform’s Effects on Fish Populations, OilPrice.com Retrieved from http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Oil-Platforms-Effect-on-Fish-Populations.html

JeremyT Claisse, Danile J. Pondella II, Laurel A. Zahn, Chelsea M. William, Johnathan P. Williams and Ann S. Bull, Oil platform off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally, Retrieved from  www.pnas.org/content/111/43/15462

OIL PRESENCE IN FISHERIES

When one thinks of an oil spill in the ocean they rarely consider that it could affect fisheries, as they are controlled environments. Despite this fact, efforts still have to be made to protect it. In fact these areas may need more protection as there is valuable equipment housed there. Unlike the open ocean where fishes can swim away from oil this is not so for fishes in fisheries. They are usually in a restricted space so escape is not really an option. Fish there are also subject to taint as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as fish in the ocean. This means they also buildup build up toxic substances in their tissue, experience reproductive problems, mutations and heart defects. However the fish are easy to monitor as they are at a particular location. Therefore the contaminated fish can be given time for the contaminants to naturally be removed from their tissues (ITOPF, 2004). This process is called depuration. Fish are constantly monitored for contaminant concentrations and when an acceptable level is reached they can then be used commercially. The limitation of this depuration time period is that the fish may grow larger than the required size for sale. Apart from commercial use there are fisheries for recreation that also support the economy for example there is the presence of bait and tackle shops there as well as other businesses (Upton, 2011).

                                   

fig 1 taken from http://spacecollective.org/matthewspencer

fig 2 taken from http://www.constantinealexander.net/science/page/69/

The pictures show how fish is reared in a controlled environment. The fish here depend on their fish farmers to supply food as opposed to hunting for themselves. Also they are safe from predators so overall this environment provides very few stressors. However it is easy to see how floating oil can enter these areas as they appear very unguarded. Fig 1 shows an Aquapod which has an innovative design and is suited for rough conditions as it is dynamic due to suspension cables and not being attached to other pods. Fig 2 show fish rearing cages arranged close to each but with enough space for small boats to pass through. This access allows for feeding to be done more efficiently.   

It is difficult to know how much an oil spill has affected a fishery as other external factors come in to play. Some include climate, natural population decline and increased fishing. Also conditions at the fishery before an oil spill may be unknown so its impact is not certain. Therefore changes in fish populations can result from a single or a variety of reasons. One of the greatest impacts known to be caused by oil was experienced by fisheries in Louisiana. Fisheries there supply 40% of the U.S. seafood supply. The effects of the Gulf of Mexico oil damaged fisheries to the extent that reporters (Matthew Biggin Venice et. al, 2010) of Reuters described it as a “Fishery Disaster”.

There is various equipment utilized at fisheries, these include lift nets, buoys, cast nets and fixed traps. All this surface equipment is susceptible to floating oil and as a result can become contaminated. Subsurface equipment can become contaminated if it is lifted through the surface coming in contact with oil there. Contaminated equipment can contaminate fish; therefore it must be cleaned, in some cases it must be dismantled before cleaning. The cleaning process involves the use of a pressure washer to remove oil. If the cost to clean exceeds the cost of new equipment the latter option is chosen. Booms and barriers are used to protect fish gear by containing floating oil preventing its spreading. It works well in calm waters but is not effective in more harsh conditions as waves may carry oil over the boom (Tech- Faq). On the other hand a protection method for the fish is the placing of heavy plastic sheets around their cages and securing it at the base. This is so that currents cannot cause the plastic to be removed exposing fish in the cage to oil. Fish tanks on shore as the name implies supports fish. The tank is linked to the sea via a pipeline and in cases where dispersed oil is in the water column the line is closed. This dispersed oil can be carried into the fish tank contaminating the pipeline on the way. This could result in the loss of the entire fish stock housed. 

Overall fisheries are very important to economies throughout the world so it is important to protect it. We as citizens can do our part by limiting the amount of oil derived substance carried to the ocean as run off. It is important to remember that the ocean is where all waterways ultimately lead to.



References

Harold F. Upton. The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and The Gulf of mexico Fishing Industry Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41640.pdf

Matthew Biggin Venice, SteveGorman and Pascal Fletcher. Factbox: Gulf Oil Spill impacts, fisheries, wildlife, tourism, Reuters Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-oil-rig-impact-factbox-idUSTRE64T23R20100530

Tech-Faq. How Do Booms Work? Retrieved from  http://www.tech-faq.com/how-do-oil-booms-work.html

ITOPF 2004. Effects of Oil Pollution on Fisheries and Mariculture, Retrieved from  https://www.scribd.com/document/191508407/Itopf-Oil-Spill-Effects-on-Fisheries

Ways to Control Oils Spills from Tankers: A Proactive Approach

When an oil spill occurs in the ocean, some of the major concerns involve the extent of ecological damage, cleanup methods and cost. What if it was possible to stop the spill from ever occuring? In previous blogs I looked at  the effects oil spills had on the fish population. However in this blog I shed light on some approaches used to limit oil spills from oil tankers to protect fish. 

Many would agree that a price cannot be placed on ecological loss, as its recovery after a spill takes many years. For this reason the transport of oil across the ocean is a risky task. To conduct activities on tankers that facilitate this transport, a capable staff must be available. Capable or not there are laws against the release of oil and to ensure compliance with these laws there are policies that contain monitoring and penalties that seek to help reduce oil spills. In regard to the laws the Coast guard and the Environmental Protection Agency are example of those that have the power to enforce them (Cohen, 2009).

Everybody knows the difference between right and wrong or so I would like to believe. There is a saying that “one does the correct thing when supervised”. I believe this is the main reason for monitoring of oil vessels. It is said that a crew working on an oil vessel, does so with more integrity when they know they are being watched. To avoid consequences such as penalties mentioned earlier, they comply with the law. Beside skill the morals of the crew must also be questioned as some oil spills are deliberate. This is done to save expenses on proper methods of cleaning ships. A report by (Parker, 2016) indicated that two engineers on an Italian oil tanker received felony charges for the dumping of oil into the ocean. They attempted to hide the spill from the coast guard but were unsuccessful. The charge each received carried a maximum penalty of $250,000 and 5 years prison time. Monitoring is expensive so it is done in the most efficient manner. Low risk ships or those less likely to cause spill are monitored less, while those that pose more risk are highly monitored. This is done based on the vessel history as it relates to oil spill events.  History can also determine penalties; a ship with a record of low compliance is likely to be subject to higher penalties. Also ships that do not report spills pay higher penalties as well.

Self reporting is an approach taken to cut government spending on monitoring. There is a list for ships that have been found to be out of compliance. The operators of such vessels tend to make a greater effort to self report, after being caught, in an attempt to regain the trust of the government and be removed from the list.

Figure 2: Alaska Oil Spill Civil Penalty Schedule
Environment	Freshwater	Marine	Public Land
Critical	US$10.00/gal US$2,940/tonne	US$2.50/gal US$735/tonne	US$1.00/gal US$294/tonne
Very sensitive	N/A	N/A	US$0.75/gal US$221/tonne
Sensitive	US$5.00/gal US$1,470/tonne	US$2.00/gal US$588/tonne	US$0.50/gal US$147/tonne
Without significant resources	US$1.00/gal US$294/tonne	US$1.00/gal US$294/tonne	US$0.25/gal US$74/tonne
The civil penalties are multiplied by the oil property factors as per figure 3.

Figure 3; Alaska Oil Property Penalty Modifying Factors
Property	Degree	Factor
Toxicity	Highly toxic	1.0
	Moderately toxic	0.75
	Less toxic	0.50
	Relatively nontoxic	0.25
Degradability	Low degradability	1.0
	Moderate degradability	0.5
	High degradability	0.25
Dispensability	High dispersibility	0.15
	Moderate dispersibility	0.50
	Low dispersibilty	1.0

Tables taken from A Worlwide Review of Marine Oil Spill Fines and Penalties 2003.

How would you decide the size of the penalty to be paid? Well, one of the methods used is to charge a price per liter/s or gallon/s of oil in an oil spill (Etkin, 2003). For a company like British petroleum that has paid billions in penalties one could only imagine the size of their spills.

Apart from legal deterrence of oil spills there is also a technical approach involving the designing of oil tankers to limit the chance of spills. One such design is the double hull oil tanker. As the name implies it has two hulls and a space separating both. The outer hull is on the sea, if this hull is breached no spill occurs as opposed to a single hull vessel. In 1992 the MARPOL Convention was amended so that all newly constructed ships would have a double hull (NOAA, 2016). In my opinion such a design should have been used from the inception of oil transport over the ocean.  

image taken from NOAA

An  illustration of damage done to the outer hull of an  vessel

Overall these approaches have proven to be effective in the reduction of oil spills, so much, that one can say that we have a good grasp of the concept of sustainable development.

References 

Mark A.Cohen. 2009, Oil Spills: The Deterrent Effects of Monitoring, Enforcement, Public Information, Resources for the future, 

Retrieved from  http://www.rff.org/blog/2009/oil-spills-deterrent-effects-monitoring-enforcement-and-public-information

Stan, Parker August 2016," Tanker Engineers Admit Hiding Oil dump From Coast Guard". Law 360, Retireved from  http://www.law360.com/articles/827716/tanker-engineers-admit-hiding-oil-dump-from-coast-guard

Dagmar, Schmidt Etkin. 2003, A Worlwide Review of Marine Oil Spill Fines and Penalties, Retrieved from  http://www.environmental-research.com/erc_papers/ERC_paper_10.pdf

NOAA 2016. A Final Farewell to Oil Tankers with Single Hulls, Office of Response and Restoration, Retrieved from http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/about/media/final-farewell-oil-tankers-single-hulls.html

EATING FISH AFTER OIL SPILL, IS IT SAFE?

Fish is a great source of protein and vitamins, it also contains Omega 3 fatty acids. These fatty acids have great health benefits, as it helps reduced heart rate and blood pressure. Altogether fish can be described as a nutritious and healthy food source. However if fish are severely contaminated by oil, both its health and nutrition benefits can be greatly diminished. In cases of oil spills the integrity of available seafood becomes an issue. To ensure public safety, tests and monitoring of seafood is done to avoid health problems. In extreme cases fishing at certain contaminated sites are  temporarily restricted. Fish species can be found in various parts of the water column. As oil sinks to the sea floor via this water column there is a chance for its contact with many fish along the way. Some species that are very susceptible are those that are scavengers and feed on anything including hazardous oil constituents. These species may be feed on by other fish transferring hazardous substance stored in their tissues. As human beings at the top of the food web it is highly likely for us to consume one or more of these contaminated fish.

photo 1* Showing coastal area restriction for fishing. Restriction may be on commercial or recreational fishing.

Oil spills affect fish in two known ways

Taint

 Oil leaves fish “tainted” having characteristics such as :-

1. Possessing an oily smell
2. Having a discoloured appearance
3. Having a rubbery texture when touched

Although tainted meat is not fit for consumption it has no known adverse health effects.

photo 2*  Showing fish covered in oil. This .fish can be considered tainted.

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Oil can also leave fish with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in their tissue.These hydrocarbons are cancer causing to humans if consumed in the right amounts over a certain period of time. Also studies have shown that certain PAH (example Benzo[a]pyrene can affect pregnant women causing negative birth effect such as premature birth, hindering heart development and asthma in childhood years.

Photo 3 Showing structure of Benzo[a]pyrene a carcinogenic hydrocarbon.

It is possible to eat fish with PAH’s if its level is within the threshold range for consumption. The process to determine if exposed fish containing PAH is safe to eat is called a Risk Assessment.


   

In recent times, one of the biggest oil spills, was the Deepwater  Horizon OIl spill that ocurred in 2010. The Louisiana fishing industry was seriously impacted by the spill and residents there believe that it still is. They based their judgement on the lack of fishing done in the area and the selling of businesses that  once sold fish produce. Also, they claimed that many people are continually leaving the area. They now describe the area as lifeless in comparison to times when there was non-stop activity. 

References
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/apr/18/lousiana-bp-oil-spill-five-years-not-going-back-to-normal

http://www.toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Polycyclic+Aromatic+Hydrocarbons

http://blog.nus.edu.sg/lucastange3246/author/lucastan/page/2/   photo 2 *

http://www.scpr.org/news/2015/06/09/52305/santa-barbara-oil-spill-shoreline-75-percent-clean/      photo 1 *

http://bodyecology.com/articles/oil-spill-fish-safe-to-eat.php

http://seafood.oregonstate.edu/.pdf%20Links/Evaluating%20the%20Risks%20for%20Peple%20Who%20Eat%20Fish%20and%20Shellfish.pdf
http://www.sanichem.com.my/hydrocarbons.html    Photo 3 *

A Closer Look At Dispersants

In this article, I intend to give the reader a somewhat comprehensive understanding, on what a dispersant is, so they can develop their own opinion on its use.Information on the history of its use, goes as far back as the 1970's. However as time went by such investigations were reduced. Despite this decline, investigations that were done focused on ecological impact. These investigations can be deemed as limited, since they emphasized more on coastal ecosystems, rather than those offshore.

Photo take from NOAA 2016

However when using dispersant, it should be noted that different methods of its application is done. Methods of its application include spraying from vessels, small airplanes and even helicopters. Simply making contact with oil does not cause dispersion; energy has to be used to create motion. Agitation facilitates the mixing of oil and dispersant, breaking up of the oil particles. However too much or too little energy from wave action is not optimal for the breakdown process. It was found that medium energy waves get the job done. Dispersants is one of many methods used to clean up oil spills. Others include allowing the oil to break down naturally and the use of Booms and Skimmers. In the hierarchy of methods used, the dispersant method was the final option.

Photo take from NOAA 2016

One may wonder why it is placed so low. I think it is based on the fact that its toxic nature, with regard to organisms, is not fully understood by anyone. This usually leads to varying opinions. In a previous article of mine, dispersants were described as being “as harmful as dish soap” and there were persons that would disagree with this statement. I also mentioned that the long term effect of dispersants on organisms was unclear. This is so because more attention is always given to its short term effects. There is significant information on the acute effects on fishes by dispersants derived from studies done in the past. One such study looked at the toxic effects on fish, by dispersant, oil, and dispersed oil. Of the three, dispersed oil ranked the most toxic followed by oil then dispersant alone. There is another study that could explain why dispersed oil may be the most toxic. This study indicated that breaking up oil exposes more of its harmful compounds. However the results from the study also showed variation in some cases, for example a particular species of fish was not affected at all by dispersed oil, but was negatively impacted by oil alone. Therefore it can be stated that dispersed oil may be toxic or non toxic based on species susceptibility. Another factor was the type of dispersant used, toxicity varied with dispersants. Corexit 9500A dispersed was found to be more toxic than JD2000 dispersed but less toxic than SPC1000 as it related to fish species tested. 

Photo take from NOAA 2016.     Image showing oil that reached coastline. Dispersant are used to try to prevent this.                              

In summary, my findings showed that while most dispersants were found to be toxic, there was some exceptions. Beside its toxicity con we must also remember its pros. The most important being the protection of our coastal areas with its ecosystems and how it facilitates our human activities (fishing, recreation, swimming).

References

Maya, Hutchins. 2012, “Effects of Oil Spill Dispersants on Marine Organisms.” Environmental Science Program, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.  Retrieved from

NOAA 2016. “Dispersants: A Guided Tour.” Office of Response and Restoration Retieved from

Retrieved from

Dead Fish In The Gulf Of Paria

A large number of fish was found floating in the Gulf of Paria, it was estimated to have been in the thousands. However speculation still surrounds what actually caused the fish kill. Information from the Environmental Management Authority and Institute of Marine Affairs claimed that the dead fish was simply a dumped catch by fishermen. The agencies back up their claim, indicating that red marks on the fish was made by fish net. The Secretary of Fisherman and Friends Gary Aboud had a different opinion on the matter. He believed that the deaths were caused by a dispersant Corexit used in the past to clean up a 2013 oil spill (Sharlene  Rampersad 2016).  The Secretary further supported his claim stating that “This area where all of the dead fish are is the exact same area the Corexit was used”. Dispersant is used in oil spills to remove them from the water surface to the subsurface. This is done so that surface oil does not reach the coastline where some ecosystems exist. These ecosystems benefit in a tradeoff with ecosystem in the deeper marine areas where sunken oil with dispersants settles. Despite Mr Aboud’s given reason for the fish kill, in an earlier article it was mentioned that Corexit was as toxic as dish soap (David Kirby 2013). Such a statement can discredit the cause put forward by the Secretary. Looking at the time period in which the dispersant was used and how it relates to the present fish kill was also questionable. The long term effect of dispersant on water dwelling organism is not certain, as was stated by the Environmental Protection Agency. Therefore it is indefinite on what was the actual cause of the fish kill.

I believe this occurrence, apart from the dispute of the cause, shed light on how an oil spill, can result in the introduction of other allegedly harmful substances into the environment, that may negatively impact fish populations.

Photo by: RISHI RAGOONATH

References

 Sharlene, Rampersad. 23 July 2016, " Aboud: Fresh fish Kill in Gulf." The Trinidad Guardian Newspaper,    Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2016-07-23/aboud-fresh-fish-kill-gulf. Accessed 29th      September 2016.

Kirby, D. (2013, April). A Deadly Paradox: Scientist Discover the Agent the Agent Used in Gulf Spill Cleanup is Destroying Marine Life. takepart.

Retrieved from http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/04/24/corexit-bp-deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-effects-marine-life

How Oil Spills Negatively Impact Fish Population

Oil spillage is one of the most alarming issues that can occur in the natural environment. Oil spills are usually as a result of human negligence while undertaking their activities (Kukreja 2016). Spills can happen on land as well as in water bodies. Sources of oil spills that affect water bodies can vary from oil rigs to oil tankers. In the event of a spill fishes are one of many animal species that is adversely affected. The extent to which they are affected is based on the type of oil and the timing of its release (NOAA 2016). This suggests that some oil spills may be more harmful than others. To clarify by example lighter oils such as diesel due to its toxicity can almost instantly kill fishes on contact but due to its volatility it does not stay in the water very long (NOAA 2016). The heavier oil tend to be less toxic but can remain in the water for extended periods of time however it is known to smother organisms in its short stint. Apart from fishes in open waters those that are reared in controlled environments such as in aquaculture also experience the effects of oil pollution. Some actual effects on fish by oil exposure are change in heart as well as respiration rate, consumption of oiled prey, an enlarged liver and being unable to reproduce offspring. Also their eggs and larvae have a less chance of survival after exposure.

To reduce the effect of oil spills its early detection is critical to avoid any worsening of the situation. Methods that assist detection include monitoring systems that work partially as well as those that support constant surveillance at oils sources. Satellite and airborne imagery are used to give an aerial picture of the cover of an oil spill, however at night this system is not so effective. For this reason it must be used with other methods such as radar and thermal imaging that give 24 hour surveillance.

Overall both oil and fish are resources used by man. Oil is responsible for the lifestyle we live today, fuels, roads and cosmetic are all products that are derived from oil. A wider outlook would be to mention that it a significant part of the economy. Fishes are also important as they support livelihoods, contribute to biodiversity and act as a food source. However the fact is that oil is more useful in the world today than fish. This does not suggest that fish lives do not matter but it would be impractical to stop using oil altogether to prevent fish death. Fish is not the only source of food and means of employment. Therefore it can be argued that cost of fishes lost in a spill does not outweigh the opportunities oil present. It would be more practical to try and limit the chances of oil spills by using detection methods mentioned earlier and also have contingency plans in place for oil spill cleanups.

References

https://www.fws.gov/home/dhoilspill/pdfs/dhjicfwsoilimpactswildlifefactsheet.pdf

http://www.conserve-energy-future.com/effects-of-oil-spills.php

http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/oil-and-chemical-spills/oil-spills/how-oil-spills-affect-fish-and-whales.html